Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
E-ISSN: 2722-0842 | P-ISSN: 2721-8309
Menu
  • Home
  • Aims and Scope
  • Announcements
  • Issue
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Peer Reviewers
  • Editorial Team
  • Search
  • History
Search
  • Register
  • Login
LogoJISDeP_Baru1
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol 5 No 1 (2024): April 2024
  4. Research Paper

Transformative Pathways of Agrarian Reform: Comparative Bibliometric Insights of Southeast Asia and Indonesia Cases

  • Dewi Gafuraningtyas Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Raldi Hendro Koestoer School of Environmental Sciences, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Hafid Setiadi Department of Geography, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Ridwan Lessy Department of Arts and Society, Charles Darwin University, Australia
https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v5i1.534

Abstract

Agrarian reform is recognized globally as a solution for reducing land ownership inequality. Many countries, including Indonesia, are still working to enhance its implementation. This study examines global agrarian reform research trends over the past decade, focusing on Southeast Asian (SEA) nations, particularly Indonesia. The methodology involved conducting a bibliometric analysis using RStudio and adhering to the PRISMA framework. The result of our analysis, which included 248 articles, reveals a trend of increasing interest in agrarian reform. Among the 20 selected articles, we observe that agrarian reform success in Europe, especially in Scandinavia, correlates with democratization. Conversely, Latin America contends with personal agenda challenges, while Africa faces issues of inclusivity and gender. SEA nations employ diverse approaches: Vietnam boosts productivity with private farming, Thailand enhances revenue through agrotourism, but Timor-Leste and the Philippines face managerial and credit access hurdles. Indonesia integrates asset and access management, yet access issues persist.


Views: 6044
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Maruf, A., Pervez, A.K.M.K., Sarker, P.K., Rahman, M.S., & Ruiz-Menjivar, J. (2022). Exploring the Factors of Farmers’ Rural–Urban Migration Decisions in Bangladesh. Agriculture, 12, 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050722

Batterbury, S. P. J., Palmer, L. R., Reuter, T. R., De Carvalho, D. do A., Kehi, B., & Cullen, A. (2015). Land access and livelihoods in post-conflict timor-leste: No magic bullets. International Journal of the Commons, 9(2), 619–647. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.514

Bennewitz, E. von. (2017). Land tenure in Latin America: From land reforms to counter-movement to neoliberalism. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(5), 1793–1798. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765051793

Botella-Rodríguez, E., & González-Esteban, Á. L. (2021). Twists and turns of land reform in Latin America: From predatory to intermediate states? Journal of Agrarian Change, 21(4), 834–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12421

Bui, M. T. T., & Preechametta, A. (2016). Land inequality or productivity: What mattered in southern Vietnam after 1975? Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 3(2), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.127

Bunce, B. (2020). Dairy joint ventures in South Africa’s land and agrarian reform programme: Who benefits? Land, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9090328

Chambati, W. (2022). The Reformed Agrarian Structure and Changing Dynamics of Rural Labour Migration in Zimbabwe. Africa Development, 47(3), 273–300. https://doi.org/10.57054/ad.v47i3.2683

Choenkwan, S., & Fisher, M. (2018). Introduction to the special section: Agrarian transformation in Thailand - commodities, landscapes, and livelihoods. Forest and Society, 2(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v2i2.5356

Drbohlav, P., Svitálek, J., & Hejkrlík, J. (2017). Socio-economic Assessment of the Philippine Agrarian Reform. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 9(2), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2017.090203.

FAO. (2003). Multilingual Thesaurus of Land Tenure. Rome.

Gafuraningtyas, D., Setiatin, N., & Anggrivianto, T. (2024). Dampak Redistribusi Tanah Terhadap Penghidupan Masyarakat di Kawasan Fora 2 (Ternate) Maluku Utara. Majalah Geografi Indonesia, 38(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.22146/mgi.70636

Gwiriri, L. C., Bennett, J., Mapiye, C., & Burbi, S. (2019). Unpacking the ‘Emergent Farmer’ Concept in Agrarian Reform: Evidence from Livestock Farmers in South Africa. Development and Change, 50(6), 1664–1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12516

Hardiyanto, B. (2021). Politics of land policies in Indonesia in the era of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. Land Use Policy, 101(October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105134

Home, R. (2022). New Directions in Land Reform: An Editorial Overview. Land, 11, 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020160

Hull, S., Babalola, K., & Whittal, J. (2019). Theories of Land Reform and Their Impact on Land Reform Success in Southern Africa. Land, 8, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8110172

Isnaeni, D., & Suratman. (2018). Reforma Agraria: Landreform dan Redistribusi Tanah di Indonesia. Malang: Intrans Publishing.

Jepsen, M. R., Kuemmerle, T., Müller, D., Erb, K., Verburg, P. H., Haberl, H., Vesterager, J. P., Andrič, M., Antrop, M., Austrheim, G., Björn, I., Bondeau, A., Bürgi, M., Bryson, J., Caspar, G., Cassar, L. F., Conrad, E., Chromý, P., Daugirdas, V., … Reenberg, A. (2015). Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010. Land Use Policy, 49, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.003

Khristoforov, I. (2022). From Speransky to Stolypin: Peasant Reform and the Problem of Land Management. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(4), S161–S173. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622090052

Kugbega, S. K. (2020). State-customary interactions and agrarian change in ghana. The case of nkoranza traditional area. Land, 9(11), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110458

Lanzona, L. A. (2019). Agrarian Reform and Democracy: Lessons from the Philippine Experience. Millennial Asia, 10(3), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399619879866

Lee, Z. Y. (2022). Implementation of agrarian reform in North Sumatra, Indonesia: The productiveness of institutional fragmentation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221094912

López, M. (2023). Unlikely Expropriators: Why Right-Wing Parties Implemented Agrarian Reform in Democratic Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies, 55(1), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X23000044

Majumdar, K. (2020). Rural Transformation in India: Deagrarianization and the Transition from a Farming to Non-farming Economy. Journal of Developing Societies, 36(2), 182-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X20912631

Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777

Merl, S. (2020). Agricultural reforms in Russia from 1856 to the present: Successes and failures in the international comparative perspective. Russian Peasant Studies, 5(2), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2020-5-2-56-87

Milošević, S. (2022). Agrarian Reform in Yugoslavia 1945–1948: the Agro-Political Aspect. Istrazivanja Journal of Historical Researches, 02(33), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.19090/i.2022.33.136-152

Mizero, M., Karangwa, A., Burny, P., Michel, B., & Lebailly, P. (2018). Agrarian and land reforms in Rwanda: Situation and perspectives. Agris On-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 10(3), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2018.100307

Salim, M., Wulan, D. R., & Pinuji, S. (2021). Reconciling community land and state forest claims in indonesia: A case study of the land tenure settlement reconciliation program in south sumatra. Forest and Society, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i1.10552

Ndlovu, W., Mwale, M., & Zuwarimwe, J. (2021). Challenges and critical success factors for rural agrarian reforms in limpopo province, south africa. Agraris, 7(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.18196/agraris.v7i2.11272

Purnomo, H., Okarda, B., Dermawan, A., Ilham, Q. P., Pacheco, P., Nurfatriani, F., & Suhendang, E. (2020). Reconciling oil palm economic development and environmental conservation in Indonesia: A value chain dynamic approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 111(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102089

Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Tacconi, L., Sloan, S., Hamdani, F. A. U., Subarudi, Alviya, I., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2019). Indonesia’s land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change. Forest Policy and Economics, 108(August 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.007

Robles, W. (2018). Revisiting Agrarian Reform in Brazil, 1985–2016. Journal of Developing Societies, 34(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X17749658

Rogatnev, Y. M., Khorechko, I. V., & Veselova, M. N. (2021). Agricultural land use in the post-reform period (2000-2020) in a market economy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 937(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/937/3/032103

Sadyohutomo, M. (2018). The benefits of an agrarian reform model in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 202(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/202/1/012030

Salim, M., & Utami, W. (2019). Reforma Agraria, Menyelesaikan Mandat Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.

Scoones, I., & Murimbarimba, F. (2021). Small Towns and Land Reform in Zimbabwe. European Journal of Development Research, 33(6), 2040–2062. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00343-3

Shaheen, N., Shaheen, A., Ramadan, A., Hefnawy, M. T., Ramadan, A., Ibrahim, I. A., Hassanein, M. E., Ashour, M. E., & Flouty, O. (2023). Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 8, 1268045. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1268045

Shonhe, T., Scoones, I., & Murimbarimba, F. (2022). Agricultural commercialisation and changing labour regimes in Zimbabwe. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 40(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2021.1933397

Sohrabi, C., Franchi, T., Mathew, G., Kerwan, A., Nicola, M., Griffin, M., Agha, M., & Agha, R. (2021). PRISMA 2020 statement: What's new and the importance of reporting guidelines. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105918.

Suharjito, D. (2018). Dramaturgy of agrarian reform in forestry sector in java Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 196(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/196/1/012046

Swardhana, G. M., & Jenvitchuwong, S. (2023). The Participation within Indigenous Land management: Developments and Challenges of Indigenous Communities Protection. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 3(2), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i1.72

Tarfi, A., & Amri, I. (2021). Reforma Agraria sebagai Jalan Menuju Perdamaian yang Berkelanjutan di Aceh. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 7(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v7i2.509

van Es, M., & Bruins, B. (2023). Pro-poor change in the aftermath of disasters – Exploring possibilities at the intersection of disaster politics and land rights issues in Central Philippines. Land Use Policy, 132(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106771

White, B., Graham, C., & Savitri, L. (2023). Agrarian movements and rural populism in Indonesia. Journal of Agrarian Change, 23(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12506

Widodo, S. (2017). A critical review of indonesia’s agrarian reform policy. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 28(3), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.5614/jrcp.2017.28.3.4

Zein, S. (2019). Reformasi Agraria Dari Dulu Hingga Sekarang di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i2.357


  • Recommendation Article
Recommendation Article
  • Kim, Youna. (Ed.). The Soft Power of the Korean Wave: Parasite, BTS and Drama (1st ed.)
    26
  • Reinvigorating Sustainable Green Economics in Indonesia: Exploring the Nexus between Global Green Economy Index and SDG 8
    25
  • Gender Wage Gap: Evidence from Employment in Informal Sector
    21
  • Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of University Students towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    21
  • Regional Approaches to Sustainable Development Goals Implementation in Education, Healthcare, Environmental Management and Urban Resilience
    20
  • Gender Dynamics Analysis: Uncovering the Roles and Identities of Bugis-Makassar Women
    19
  • The Progress of the SDGs Research
    19
  • Youth, Agriculture, and Food Security: Understanding the Farmer Regeneration Challenge in Sumatra
    19
  • Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices towards Gender Equality in Achieving SDG5
    18
  • The Silence that Screams: Enforced Disappearances and the Unfinished Reform Agenda
    17

Keywords:

agrarian reform bibliometric land ownership policy southeast asia
Galleys
  •   Download PDF
  • Total Downloads: 526
 
 
Published
2024-04-30
How to Cite
More Citation Formats
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
GafuraningtyasD., KoestoerR. H., SetiadiH., & LessyM. R. (2024). Transformative Pathways of Agrarian Reform: Comparative Bibliometric Insights of Southeast Asia and Indonesia Cases . The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 5(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v5i1.534

Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
Issue
Vol 5 No 1 (2024): April 2024
Section
Research Paper
 
 

Copyright (c) 2024 Dewi Gafuraningtyas, Raldi Hendro Koestoer, Hafid Setiadi, Mohammad Ridwan Lessy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, pre-print sites, or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater dissemination of published work.
  • Submit a Paper

<ahref="https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?search_mode=content&and_facet_source_title=jour.1388694"> <img title="Dimensions " src="https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/f2/a6/iV0vKcPH_t.png" alt="DESKRIPSI GAMBAR" width="175" height="65" border="none" /> </a></p>

Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Most read last week
  • Kim, Youna. (Ed.). The Soft Power of the Korean Wave: Parasite, BTS and Drama (1st ed.)
    26
  • Reinvigorating Sustainable Green Economics in Indonesia: Exploring the Nexus between Global Green Economy Index and SDG 8
    25
  • Gender Wage Gap: Evidence from Employment in Informal Sector
    21
  • Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of University Students towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    21
  • Regional Approaches to Sustainable Development Goals Implementation in Education, Healthcare, Environmental Management and Urban Resilience
    20
  • Gender Dynamics Analysis: Uncovering the Roles and Identities of Bugis-Makassar Women
    19
  • The Progress of the SDGs Research
    19
  • Youth, Agriculture, and Food Security: Understanding the Farmer Regeneration Challenge in Sumatra
    19
  • Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices towards Gender Equality in Achieving SDG5
    18
  • The Silence that Screams: Enforced Disappearances and the Unfinished Reform Agenda
    17

Sub Menu

  • Contact
  • Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement
  • Ethical Clearance
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial and Peer Reviewer Process
  • Editorial Team
  • Peer Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Copyright notice
  • Open Access Policy
  • Archiving
  • Indexing
  • Article Processing Charge
  • Publication Frequency
  • Privacy Statement
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Citedness in Scopus Database

Information

For Author For Readers For Librarians

Statistics

Visit Google Scholar

Free counters!

Accreditation

  PDF



Contact Us

Phone: +62-21-31928280, 31928285, 31928279

Fax: +62 21 31928281

E-mail: journal.pusbindiklatren@bappenas.go.id



View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.
ISSN Internasional Centre | ISSN Online | ISSN Print